Franchising in Japan: Checking Statutory Disclosure Requirements Before You Sign
Before joining a franchise in Japan, distinguish between legal disclosure duties and guideline recommendations. Learn how to check which rules apply, identify missing information and track matters that have not been explained.
Published
What should you check if a prospective franchisor tells you, ‘We are not subject to statutory disclosure requirements’? The key is not to let that statement bring your enquiries to an end. Before joining a franchise network as an independent business operator, understand the scope of disclosure duties and how to verify the information you receive before signing.
1. Distinguish legal duties from guidelines
In Japan, not every franchise agreement is subject to the same pre-contract disclosure duties. Your first reference point should be Article 11 of the Act on the Promotion of Small and Medium-sized Retail Business. A franchisor whose operation qualifies as a ‘specified chain business’ under this Act must provide prospective franchisees with written information, including an overview of its business and the main terms of the agreement, and explain it before the contract is signed.
Providing documents and explaining their contents are separate requirements. Do not assume that receiving the paperwork is enough: check which matters have been explained and whether anything remains unclear.
The other key reference is the Japan Fair Trade Commission’s ‘Guidelines Concerning the Franchise System under the Antimonopoly Act’, commonly known as the Franchise Guidelines. These are not a standalone disclosure law. They set out conduct that may raise concerns under the Antimonopoly Act, including how franchisors recruit franchisees and conduct business with them.
The guidelines cover franchise chains in all sectors, not just retail and food service. They also recommend providing and explaining written information on important matters in advance, so that prospective franchisees can properly assess the agreement.
You should therefore distinguish between information that must legally be provided and explained, and information whose disclosure is recommended under the guidelines. Being outside the scope of a statutory duty does not make the information needed for an informed decision any less important.
2. Check the substance of the business, not its label
Japan’s Small and Medium Enterprise Agency explains that an operation is considered a specified chain business if it meets the following six requirements:
- Its franchisees are primarily small and medium-sized retailers.
- It operates under contracts based on standard terms and conditions.
- It sells goods, or arranges their sale, on an ongoing basis.
- It provides ongoing business management guidance.
- It allows franchisees to use specified trademarks, trade names or similar branding.
- It collects payments, such as joining fees or security deposits, when franchisees join.
The first two requirements concern the structure of the business; the remaining requirements concern provisions to check in the contract. Retail and food-service chains are typical examples, but you need to examine actual transactions alongside the contract terms, rather than relying on branding or the category used in recruitment materials.
Ask the franchisor, ‘Do you consider the business opportunity being offered to fall within the definition of a specified chain business?’ If the answer is no, ask which requirements it believes are not met and why. An explanation based solely on terminology — such as ‘It is a partnership agreement, not a franchise’ — is not enough to assess the position.
For example, an operation focused mainly on services may also involve supplying goods and providing management guidance. In that case, establish what is sold, to whom, and whether goods are supplied or their sale is arranged on an ongoing basis. If necessary, ask a lawyer to check how the law applies. You do not need to reach a legal conclusion on your own.
3. List the disclosure items and distinguish ‘not stated’ from ‘not applicable’
When requesting disclosure documents, it is often more useful to ask, ‘Please identify the disclosures required by law and show where each appears’, rather than simply requesting a document by name. A professionally produced booklet does not, by itself, establish that all the necessary information is there.
The main pre-contract disclosure items identified by the Small and Medium Enterprise Agency include the franchisor’s shareholders, subsidiaries, financial position, changes in outlet numbers and number of legal proceedings. They also include important contractual matters such as joining fees and royalties, trading terms for goods and raw materials, the contract term and termination conditions. These are examples of key items, not an exhaustive list of statutory disclosures.
A practical checklist could use the following format:
| Check | Details to record |
|---|---|
| Disclosure item | What the information concerns |
| Location | Document title, preparation date and page |
| Scope | Relevant legal entity, reporting period, outlets covered, etc. |
| Explanation status | Explained, not yet explained, or further questions outstanding |
| Unresolved matters | Missing information and when the franchisor expects to respond |
Pay particular attention to blank fields. ‘No information is given’ is not the same as ‘there is nothing to report’. Ask whether a blank means the item is not applicable, the information has not been compiled, or the franchisor has chosen not to disclose it. Even where the answer is ‘none’, asking the franchisor to specify the relevant period and legal entity can help prevent misunderstandings.
When comparing brands, use the unresolved matters column rather than the thickness of their information packs. Where a brand provides less information, you may lack the basic facts needed to make a decision, even before comparing profits and costs.
4. Do not sign an acknowledgement while explanations remain incomplete
At the disclosure meeting, do more than ask the franchisor to read through the documents. Start with the gaps and unclear points you have identified in advance. Break your questions into specific points that can be answered, such as, ‘Does this section refer to the legal entity that will be the other party to my contract?’ or ‘As at what date does this figure apply?’
After the meeting, record when you received the documents, when they were explained, who explained them and which items require further answers. If documents are replaced, retain the earlier versions and check what changed and why. The purpose is not to establish which document takes precedence, but to keep a record of what was disclosed and when.
If you are asked to sign an acknowledgement stating that you have ‘received and understood explanations of all items’, check whether it accurately reflects what happened. Avoid signing a statement confirming that everything has been explained when some matters have not. Discuss an approach that reflects the facts, such as expressly recording unresolved matters.
Even where a franchisor says it is outside the statutory requirements, the Small and Medium Enterprise Agency emphasises the importance of disclosing and explaining important matters in writing beforehand. If information that is essential to your decision is withheld, ask why and assess the risks of proceeding without it.
An incomplete disclosure does not necessarily make the contract automatically invalid or guarantee a refund of money paid. Recruitment involving false or exaggerated disclosures may raise issues under the Antimonopoly Act as ‘deceptive customer inducement’, but this requires an assessment of the specific facts. If your concerns remain unresolved, seek professional advice before signing.
Practical takeaway: Ask the franchisor whether disclosure duties apply and the reasons for its assessment, then list where each required item can be found. Your benchmark should not be ‘I have received the documents’, but ‘I have identified missing information and unexplained matters, and have the information I need to make an informed decision’.
