Preparing for Due Diligence Visits Before Franchising: Helping Prospective Franchisees Verify Your Business
Before recruiting your first franchisees in South Korea, design a due diligence process that lets candidates assess how your head office and company-owned outlets actually operate. This practical guide covers disclosure materials, visit arrangements and question records.
Published

When turning an existing retail or service business into a franchise, enabling prospective franchisees to verify things for themselves matters just as much as explaining the business clearly. Candidates need to assess the franchisor’s support capabilities and day-to-day outlet operations, while the franchisor must protect customer information and trade secrets. A healthy franchise community starts with verifiable due diligence, not an impressive guided tour. Before recruitment begins, decide what you will show, who will answer which questions and how you will record anything that could not be verified.
1. Distinguish due diligence visits from statutory disclosure procedures
In this article, a due diligence visit means a process in which prospective franchisees visit the franchisor’s head office and operating outlets, and review relevant materials to help them decide whether to enter into a franchise agreement. It does not mean a separate statutory event that every franchisor must conduct in the same format. The key is to arrange it voluntarily as a complement to legally required disclosures.
Franchise transactions in South Korea are governed by the Fair Transactions in Franchise Business Act. This legislation sets out requirements including the registration and provision of franchise disclosure documents and the advance provision of franchise agreements. Disclosure under Article 7 and advance provision of the agreement under Article 11 each have their own requirements. A signed statement confirming that a candidate has visited the premises or received a full explanation cannot replace these obligations or the statutory waiting periods.
In particular, do not encourage candidates to rush into signing an agreement or paying franchise fees simply because the visit has gone well. The person responsible should separately track whether statutory documents have been provided and on what dates, and explain the distinction between the visit date and the earliest date on which an agreement may be signed. Before relying on an exception that shortens a waiting period, check the relevant statutory conditions separately.
State the purpose of the visit briefly in the visit information sheet. For example: ‘A visit to review operating methods and support arrangements before entering into a franchise agreement.’ Also explain who will attend, what may be observed, where photography is permitted and how questions should be submitted. Make clear that completing the visit does not constitute agreement to the contract or a guarantee of profitability.
2. Organise disclosure materials around questions
When setting up a document room, it is more effective to start with the questions candidates want answered than to accumulate company brochures. Link materials to questions that genuinely inform their decision, such as: ‘Who supports preparations for opening?’, ‘Who do I contact if something goes wrong?’ and ‘Can the current operating model work at other outlets?’
A checklist covering the following points can help reveal gaps in your explanations.
- The franchisor’s business: Prepare materials that establish the contracting entity, office premises, responsible teams and actual points of contact.
- Ability to deliver support: Show the duties of current staff and records of support provided, distinguishing these from services that are still at the planning stage.
- Operating methods: Let candidates review a typical workflow, from taking orders and supplying products through to closing procedures.
- Scope of costs: Distinguish items included in quoted costs from those that may be charged separately.
- Unresolved matters: Mark suppliers or support arrangements that have not yet been finalised as pending decisions.
Date each document and specify what it applies to. Even accurate materials can mislead if candidates cannot tell whether they describe current company-owned outlet operations or plans for future franchisees. If a verbal explanation differs from the disclosure document or franchise agreement, record the discrepancy for checking rather than attempting to resolve it through an improvised interpretation during the visit.
Set access levels for each type of material. For example, provide copies of general information, allow detailed operational materials to be viewed on site, and anonymise records containing customer or employee personal data before making them available. Where trade secrets need protection, consider a confidentiality agreement, but do not use it to withhold legally required disclosures or obstruct reasonable scrutiny.
3. Show normal operations, not just the best moments
Avoid staging the visit as a special event. If extra experienced staff are brought in only for the visit, or the owner personally serves every customer, candidates will struggle to judge how demanding normal operations are. If staffing or promotional activities differ from usual practice, explain why at the outset and record the difference.
You do not need to show an entire day at a company-owned outlet. You should, however, explain what the chosen time slot does and does not reveal. A quiet afternoon may show preparation work and stock management, but it will not readily reveal queues or staffing pressures during peak periods. Where necessary, offer another visit at a different time or supplement the visit with operational records from which personal data has been removed.
Plan the route through the premises to minimise disruption to customers and staff. Exclude areas where customer payment screens or employee contact details are visible from photography, and restrict entry to working areas in line with safety and hygiene standards. Rather than simply citing ‘head office policy’, explain the reasons for these restrictions and offer alternative ways to verify the relevant information.
At head office, focus on actual workflows rather than office size. Using a hypothetical example, you could demonstrate who receives an outlet’s enquiry, how responsibility for handling it is assigned and where the outcome is recorded. If you use real franchisee enquiry records, remove identifying information and sensitive content first.
If you do not yet have any franchised outlets, state that clearly. Do not present an interview with a company-owned outlet manager as though it were testimony from an existing franchisee. Results achieved at a company-owned outlet may differ from those achievable by an independent franchisee, so explain relevant differences, such as lease terms or the business owner’s involvement on site.
4. Record unanswered questions and follow them up
The output of due diligence should be a record of questions and answers, not a collection of visit photographs. For each question, record the materials reviewed, who answered and whether further investigation is needed. If you do not know the answer during the visit, check and respond later rather than guessing. Answers about responsibility for costs and the scope of support are best reviewed jointly by the people responsible for contracts and operations.
Records are easier to manage if each item is assigned one of three statuses.
- Verified: The materials provided and the explanation are consistent, with no outstanding questions.
- Further checks required: Staff review or additional documents are needed. Assign someone to respond and set a target date.
- Cannot currently be verified: There is no operating history, or terms have not been finalised, so there is not yet an adequate basis for assessment.
After the visit, send the record to the prospective franchisee and give them an opportunity to request factual corrections. If you ask for a signature, it should ideally confirm only receipt of the record or attendance at the visit. Do not try to reduce the franchisor’s responsibility to provide explanations through blanket wording such as ‘I understand all risks and will raise no objections in future.’
If the same questions recur, do not assume that visitors simply fail to understand. Your cost schedule may be unclear, or the description of support may not match how work is actually carried out. Review the question records and revise your information materials. If a change also affects statutory documents, check the separate procedures required for lawful amendment and provision. Avoid updating only the visit materials while leaving the contractual documents unchanged.
Practical takeaway: Before inviting your first prospective franchisee, prepare a list of materials to be disclosed, a planned route through the premises and a question-and-answer record sheet. Due diligence that openly identifies what cannot be shown or verified helps build trust across the franchise community.



